It is well settled principle that mere possession of the counterfeit stamps does not come under the mischief of section 25-A if which was not produced for sale or buy. The High Court Division held that none of the witnesses disclosed that the seized documents were recovered at the time of selling or buying the same by the accused appellant. It is the case of the prosecution that the documents were recovered from the counter of the accused appellant not at the time of selling the seized materials so, no offence committed by the accused appellant provided under section 25-A(b) of the Special Powers Act. Md. Shah Alam Ukil, son of late Muksed Ali Ukil of Village Char Kalpur, Police Station and District – Gopalganj. -Vs.- The State (Criminal) 2019 ALR (HCD) Online 289 ....View Full Judgment